Client Case StudyMiami, FloridaTrailing 12 months · 2026
Miami submarket~220 unitsSame-store
Revenue Management Case Study

A large Miami operator grew same-store RevPAR 64% with Pacer.

A ~220-unit short-term-rental operator in Miami brought Pacer in as their embedded revenue management function. The figures below are same-store, drawn from the 90 units managed across both full years, so growth from added inventory is stripped out and only revenue management shows through.

+64%
Same-store Adj. RevPAR · TTM vs prior 12
+27 pts
Occupancy · 50% to 77%
+62%
Same-store revenue · $1.40M to $2.27M
+6%
ADR · grown, not discounted
The starting point

A strong brand, leaving occupancy on the table.

The operator had a desirable Miami book and healthy rates, but the calendar told the real story. Same-store occupancy sat at roughly 50 percent. Soft mid-week and shoulder dates went unfilled, rate moves were reactive, and the booking window was short and last-minute. There was real revenue between the rate they were getting and the demand they were not converting.

What Pacer did

Filled the calendar without giving up rate.

Occupancy-led rate strategy

Daily rate adjustments tied to booking velocity versus the comp set. Soft dates were priced to move and peak dates were protected, lifting occupancy from 50 to 77 percent while ADR still rose 6 percent. Occupancy was earned, not bought.

Extended the booking window

By opening the calendar further out, layering early-booking rate structures, and laddering minimum stays on peak dates, the operator pulled reservations in earlier and reduced its dependence on last-minute fills. The same-store advance booking window lengthened year over year, giving the team more pacing visibility and more room to optimize.

Stay-length pricing

Length-of-stay discounting and minimum-night logic built per unit, shifting the mix toward longer, higher-value bookings on the dates that warranted it and staying flexible where one-night demand was real.

Fee and distribution discipline

Fee architecture aligned to unit value, and channel mix actively managed across OTAs so the calendar filled from the right demand at the right price, not just the cheapest channel.

The results

Same units. Same market. Different book.

Metric (same-store)BeforeAfterChange
Adjusted RevPAR$42.73$70.08+64%
Occupancy50%77%+27 pts
Average Daily Rate$86$91+6%
Same-store revenue$1.40M$2.27M+62%
Why it matters

This is what an embedded revenue management function looks like. Same 90 units, same Miami market, a 64 percent lift in same-store RevPAR driven by occupancy, not by buying volume with discounts. The kind of result an operator cannot reach with a pricing tool alone, and would otherwise need a full in-house RM team to chase.